Showing posts with label Jim Keltner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jim Keltner. Show all posts

Monday, 16 February 2015

Drug Free Roundtable


In my recent post Blessed Are The Drug Free Paul McCartney said that getting high during the recording process is a bad idea because “tuning up is a bit of a chore when you're stoned” (MYFN p.192). Flaming Lips singer Wayne Coyne makes a similar point

I try to remind people, that when [creative] people are willing to do drugs, it’s just another way of saying “F**k man I don’t have any limits. I’ll try things and see what happens.” Making music is such an internal, psychic connection that people have. When you have to collaborate with people, I don’t know too many people that would want to be [high]. We would want to do the drugs and then go out and have fun. We wouldn’t want to sit in our studio and struggle with what the kick-drum is going to sound like. Speakeasy 




Film director John Waters agrees with Ringo who said “we found out very early on that if you play it stoned or derelict in any way it was really sh**ty music - so we would have the experiences and then bring that into the music later” (SOL p.110).

Everybody said, “Oh, you must've been on drugs when you made those movies”. No, we weren't on drugs when we made them. I was on drugs when I thought them up, and I was on drugs when we showed them. But I was never on drugs when we made them because it was too hard [to work when you're high]. NPR

Even when they were high the Beatles benefitted from straight engineers and producers. George Martin observed “There's no doubt that, if I too had been on dope, Pepper would never have been the album it was” (AYNIE p.206). Lennon wasn't so lucky during his solo career however



Drummer Jim Keltner “John was exercising all his bad habits, as were we all, including Phil [Spector], the only problem with that was that Phil was the producer, and somebody had to be sane.” The article notes that Spector would often dress as a surgeon, karate instructor or cowboy, shooting the ceiling and chasing Lennon with a loaded revolver. Ultimate Classic Rock


Lennon expressed doubts about crediting drugs as the source of his creativity asking “Did Dylan Thomas write Under Milk Wood on beer?... the beer [and] the drugs are to prevent the rest of the world from crowding in on you. They don't make you write better”. Beatles Interviews


In an interview with Slate, comedian Marc Maron calls such crediting “romanticizing and unfair”
Slate: I’ve heard literary scholars suggest that mind-altering substances helped certain artists do their best work? 
Maron: What people forget, English professors included, is that those artists were probably geniuses—so to give that much credence to a substance is romanticizing and unfair. Would we not have that art if it wasn’t for drugs? I don’t know. But I guarantee you that at that moment in time, most of them … weren’t thinking, “I’m a genius. If I take this medicine or if I get strung out on this s**t, that’s when I’m doing to do my best work.”...Whatever the relationship was between their mental health and their addiction, you can speculate all you want, but it’s not a system built to generate brilliant things.

Arjune Rama: What Marc Maron Taught Me About Addiction



Read the full Blessed Are The Drug Free post here 

Other Links


Friday, 6 January 2012

10 Preconceptions About The Beatles (pt 3)

Let's wrap up the last 6 illusions I was labouring under (or was I?) when I started this blog.
Read the previous parts here and here.



5) None of the Beatles were very good players. Especially Ringo

WRONG - Forget 'Bigger Than Jesus', no Beatles quote has been more misunderstood and misused than Lennon's “Ringo isn't even the best drummer in the Beatles” wisecrack. And it was just that - a wisecrack. So for the record here's three reasons why Ringo was an amazing drummer

1) The sheer number of beats and styles he navigated with ever really repeating himself over 211 songs
2) The fact that in 7 years of recording that only a handful of takes broke down due to an error on Ringo's part
3) The incredible feel he displayed in combining swing time and straight time in the same song. Straight fills in a swingtime song, changing from section to section, it's subtle and very, very hard to pull off. Jim Keltner is the only other drummer I've heard manage it.

(There's more Ringo love here and here)

It's true that none of the band were virtuosos. They never left the stage for 20 minutes while Ringo got his groove on and set his gong on fire (oooh missus) or George whipped out the violin bow. They all played for the song. Always and forever. But the band boasted 3 solid competent guitarists, McCartney was a genius multi-instrumentalist and Lennon and McCartney were world class vocalists.



6) Sergeant Pepper may be a classic album but I don't really like it, and the individual songs aren't that great

RIGHT. And WRONG. And HALF RIGHT. -  Yes it is a classic album. Just so you know. But here's the surprise. I really like it! I heard Pepper a lot growing up, and didn't rate it. I think the reason was aged 15 I was looking for songs that would work in a heavy metal context. While The Who and even Abba (don't ask) had tracks that would translate, Pepper was a dud. But that's no way to judge an album! It's true it has less 'stand alone' songs than any other album (bar Abbey Road) and it would have been stronger with Penny Lane and Strawberry Fields Forever. But c'mon - A Day In The Life? And I personally love Within You Without You, When I'm Sixty Four and Getting Better.




7) The Beatles are overrated

WRONG - Ridiculous as it may sound the Beatles are underrated purely because they so lauded for unimportant superficial reasons that it cause people to miss the most crucial thing. They were the greatest songwriters since the Broadway showtune writers like Gershwin, Kern and Porter




8) The Beatles are the greatest band in history

RIGHT - The combination of great songs plus innovation in business, technology, marketing, breaking box office, viewing and chart records and other 'firsts' mean no one act will ever be able to touch the fab four



9) The Beatles were a great live band

Pretty much WRONG - The Beatles were a great live band long before they were recording artists but by the time they finished in 69-70 they were abysmal and you could argue that they began to go downhill as soon as Brian Epstein began limited them to playing less than an hour per live gig.

Think about this. Next time you listen to a classic Beatles song reflect on the fact that you're almost certainly hearing the very last time that the Beatles EVER played that song.




10) I want to be Woody Guthrie when I grow up

WRONG - Two years ago my ambition was to have the breadth of songwriting ability of Woody Guthrie – a man that could tackle the political This Land Is Your Land and then turn round and knock out a kids classic like Going To The Zoo.

Glossing over the fact the Guthrie didn't write the latter song (Tom Paxton did) I've found a new role model. Who else could kick off an album with a snide political R&B song, followed by a Puff The Magic Dragon wannabe then a Raga meet Classical song about isolation and make it all sound unified? Revolver-era Beatles, that who.

So now I want to be the Beatles (if and) when I grow up.



I know a lot of my readers grew up on Abbey Road and cut their teeth on Rubber Souls, but can you remember any preconceptions you had before listening to the Beatles? Were you right?